Google’s “Me on the Web” Isn’t Reputation Management

Google meI don’t understand how the press on Google’s recently launched “Me on the Web” tool classifies this feature as a reputation management tool. “Me on the Web” is basically an FAQ, a repackaging of pre-existing information and tools that Google hosts in it’s Account Help section and links to from users’ account dashboard. Regardless, this repackaging is an affirmation that searchers are increasingly interested in and concerned about the information associated with their names and email addresses. Searchers care about what others see connected to their names in search results, and they want to know how to manage it.

Here’s Google’s official stance:

We run into a lot of people who think that Google runs the web and controls all the sites on it, but that’s really not the case. The sites in Google’s search results are controlled by those sites’ webmasters.

Essentially Google is saying, “We don’t own this stuff, we just distribute it. Don’t blame us.” But searchers do. Hence the need for “Me on the Web.”

So what can the average human being do to manage their online reputation viewed through Google’s search results? Not much really, unless the content in question is confidential personal information. Google recommends:

  1. Set up a Google profile: The best way to be sure Google sees the good side of you is to feed it the information directly.
  2. Set up Google search alerts for your data

    Be knowledgeable: Google yourself and/or set up alerts. Googling yourself is hardly new, and Google Alerts have been around for years. But Google does add a nice twist to the equation here by offering a link to “Set up search alerts for your data” that pops up a prepopulated box with your name and email address to get you started.

  3. Remove unwanted content from the site: Searchers who find skeletons in their search results are encouraged to remove the content themselves if it’s on a site or profile they own, or to contact the owner to request that they remove the content. If it’s a news source, you’re out of luck. If the content is from someone who is intentionally trying to smear you, you’re out of luck. If the site owner doesn’t want to or doesn’t exist anymore, you’re out of luck.
  4. Request removal from search results:  If you own the content, you can request that Google remove it from their search results. This option only works for site owners and under urgent circumstances. Google’s definition of urgent, by the way, doesn’t include your embarrassment at being photographed with a lampshade on your head at that party last weekend.
  5. Post positive content: Push negative content lower in the search results by blogging, creating positive profiles on social sites like Twitter and Facebook, getting positive press, etc.

Violations of  privacy involving personal confidential information like social security numbers, financial account numbers, images of your signature and instances of names fraudulently associated with pornography do receive special treatment, however.

If you find a page in Google search results that lists personal information such as your social security or credit card number, let us know using the links below. Google will contact the site’s hosting company to request that the page be taken down from the web. We’ll also take steps to remove the information from our search results.

It seems to me that Google’s “Me on the Web” is primarily a CYA tactic to stir up a little good press and deflect searcher frustration, not an actual concern about reputation management. It does little for the common concerns of everyday searchers, and leaves them with few options to combat minor but embarrassing reputation issues.

I can’t say I really blame Google for the stance its taking, though. There’s no sane way to mediate the world’s online tantrums to identify what is embarrassing “truth” worth returning in search results and what is just harmful maliciousness that doesn’t deserve to be seen.

You like potato and I like potahto,
You like tomato and I like tomahto
Potato, potahto, Tomato, tomahto,
Let’s call the whole thing off


Web PieRat logo.

Originally posted on Web PieRat.

Ask Sponsored Listings –> Now Sendori

 

First IAC’s Ask.com acquired Sendori in 2009, and now Ask Sponsored Listings has been merged with Sendori. This comes from the Ask account rep team:

Ask Sponsored Listings is now Sendori!
Ask Sponsored Listings has merged with Sendori, Inc., an operating
business of IAC.
Sendori is an innovator in web navigation with a rapidly growing global audience. Sendori delivers web sites faster and eliminates security threats associated with mistyped domains. The largest ISPs on the internet have partnered with Sendori to provide better web navigation services for their subscribers. As the only operator of a Direct Navigation Search Exchange, Sendori provides advertisers with access to 12 million monthly US visitors and 14 million monthly global visitors. Advertisers also benefit from the Sendori VirtualBar technology to deliver offers directly to in-market consumers. To learn more about Sendori, visit www.sendori.com.
We believe the combined entity will create exciting future opportunities for our clients.
As we launch our new brand and product offering, rest assured our current Sponsored Listings service offering remains the same:

  • Access 30 billion monthly queries from the Sponsored Listings network. Real-time performance optimization with our proprietary PureLeads technology.
  • Your current account will remain intact. All your existing sponsored listings, bids, ad copy and budget will remain active. There are no changes required on your end. Your existing account login credentials will continue to work.
  • Our Ad Center functionality will not change. The only difference you will notice is our new logo and branding treatment.

We are very excited about this launch and will continue to deliver updates as we move through this launch period.
Frequently Asked Questions:
1. What’s changing at Ask/IAC?
Ask Sponsored Listings is merging with Sendori, Inc. and is now a wholly owned subsidiary of IAC. Ask.com will continue to operate as a wholly owned subsidiary of IAC.

2. Why are you separating from Ask.com?
Our Sendori Direct Navigation Exchange represents an entirely new product offering, centered around Direct Navigation. This unique exchange is not a search results product, displayed on a traditional SERP.

3. What’s happening to the existing sponsored listings network?
The sponsored listings network will remain in place. Your account (ads, keywords, CPCs, etc.) will remain active. Our extensive network will continue to operate, providing distribution throughout select IAC-owned search sites and our publisher network. The only change to our network, other than its new name Sendori Sponsored Listings network is the sunsetting of Ask.com traffic. The amount of Ask.com search traffic in our network has been declining following the re-launch of Q&A services last year.

4. Are you getting out of the sponsored listings business?
No, our sponsored listings product continues to be an important asset to the Sendori product line. We will continue to invest in our sponsored listings technology.

5. What will happen to my existing Ask Sponsored Listings campaigns?
Your existing account and campaign setup will not change. Your currently active insertion order will remain in place. There is no need to sign a new insertion order.

6. What will happen to the Ask Sponsored Listings AdCenter?
The ASL AdCenter will be rebranded with our new Sendori brand treatment, but all functionality will remain the same. Your existing account login credentials will continue to work. All ad serving and reporting functionality will remain the same.


Web PieRat logo.

Originally posted on Web PieRat.

Musings on The Danger of Algorithms

I have a love/less-love relationship with algorithms. Yes, you choose what content to consume, but algorithms choose the pool you get to choose from. Mostly I love algorithms — professionally they’re the reason I’m employed, and personally they help me weed through the overwhelming amount of information that floods my life. But I do often wonder and occasionally worry about what I’m NOT seeing that I should.

Interesting TED video on algorithms and the control they wield via The Next Web: The Danger of Algorithms. The speaker is Eli Pariser, Moveon.org’s Board President, a co-founder of Avaaz.org, and the author of The Filter Bubble.


Web PieRat logo.

Originally posted on Web PieRat.

95% Drop in Search Counts on Google AdWords Keyword Tool

 

Google AdWords quietly updated its Keyword Tool on Sept. 7, resulting a dizzying drop of up to 95% in search counts for some phrases. For those who rely heavily on the keyword tool to predict potential SEO performance increases or to identify phrases to optimize for, this update will come as a heavy blow. Details are sketchy from Google, and the SEO community has been silent on the issue except for Dave Naylor and a few folks in the forums. So what happened?

“If you use both the previous and updated versions of the Keyword Tool to search for keywords, you may notice differences between the tools for statistics on Global Monthly Searches and Local Monthly Searches. This is because the previous version of the Keyword Tool provides search statistics based on Google.com search traffic and traffic from search partners, while the updated version of the Keyword Tool provides search statistics based on Google.com traffic only.  We’ve updated these statistics based on user feedback, and hope you find them helpful for keyword selection.” >> from AdWordsPro on the AdWords Help Forum

The Search Network: Your ads may appear alongside or above search results, as part of a results page as a user navigates through a site’s directory, or on other relevant search pages. Our global Search Network includes Google Maps, Google Product Search and Google Groups along with entities such as Virgin Media and Amazon.com. >> from AdWords Help

OK, so previously the data was based on an aggregation of Google.com searches and traffic from search partners like Amazon and Virgin Media. But since the Sept. 7, the data is based solely on Google.com searches. Am I the only one who would have found that incredibly helpful to know before now that a data source as large as Amazon’s was skewing the data in the Google keyword tool?

Yes, we all knew/theorized/suspected that the AdWords keyword tool data was skewed. And given the source (Google) and the purpose of the tool (get advertisers to pay for ads on keywords) we took it with a grain of salt. But seriously, 95% inflation is a very, very big grain of salt.

If you don’t already, this is a wake up call to diversify your SEO data sources and understand that most public SEO data is relative rather than exact. First, diversification. Try using more than one data source for keyword data. There are a lot of tools out there, but these are the old stand-bys: WordTracker, Keyword Discovery, SEO Book’s tool. Keep in mind the source of each tool’s data — they either use the APIs from the engines themselves or toolbar & ISP data, which renders each pretty much as reliable as the Google keyword tool anyway.

Which brings us to relativity. Get used to the reality that you will never know the exact number of searches that occur for any given keyword or phrase. Public keyword data and search frequency data are imprecise. The only data you can be certain of in SEO is the data that comes from your own log files on your own site. All other data is approximate. If you base projections on approximations, be certain that you take into account the squidginess of the data sources.

In this update, the biggest differences between pre and post appear to be on the larger, more competitive head terms, both in this sample and in the analysis I’ve been doing over my own keyword sets. Here’s an example. Let’s pretend we’re researching keywords for a site that offers hotel reservations. I might target sampling of keywords like these.

google adwords keyword tool update examples
Click to view larger. Data source: Google AdWords Keyword Tool, Exact Match, US English.

Had I taken the Google AdWords Keyword Tool at face value, I would expect there to be a US English keyword market of 450,000 searches for the phrase [san francisco hotels]. I might choose project to win 10% of those searches and figure a conversion rate of 5% based on my analytics. Each conversion might bring me say $10, so I might project a value of (((450,000 * 10%) *5%) *$10) = $22,500 in a month.

Unfortunately, the updated number based on true Google.com searches, according to the tool in September, is 95% lower at 33,100. So now we’re looking at (((33,100 * 10%) *5%) *$10) = $1,655 in a month. Not bad for a single keyword in a single month, but much lower than the previous projection and it comes with hefty competition.

For a detailed description on safer ways to project, see SEOmoz’s post: Predicting Yearly Site Traffic.


Web PieRat logo.

Originally posted on Web PieRat.

Covario Acquires Netconcepts: Software and SEO Services for Results and ROI

Covario Acquires Netconcepts

Netconcepts is officially Covario. As of 7 a.m. CST today, my fellow Netconcepts search geeks and I are now Covarians. We’ve been acquired by Covario Inc., the leader in enterprise class search advertising software and services, headquartered in San Diego, CA.

“With the acquisition of Netconcepts and the GravityStream technology, Covario is bringing a unique solution to advertisers to help them accelerate their ability to present their brands on all the major search engines globally,” said Russ Mann, Chief Executive Officer of Covario. “By coupling the predictive analytics in Covario’s Organic Search Insight with easy execution capabilities of Netconcepts’ GravityStream technology, advertisers will be able to identify the SEO actions that drive better rankings, and then deploy those strategies quickly, and in a highly scalable way to achieve their ROI goals.”

I’m looking forward to being part of Covario’s:

  1. D3 for SEO (Data Driven Decisions). Love the focus here. SEO theory & planning without implementation is a waste of time. But SEO implementation without data on which to base decisions is terrifying. This acquisition combines a solution that drives decisions (Covario’s Organic Search Insight) with a solution that implements decisions (Netconcepts’ GravityStream technology).
  2. Focus on brand advertising clients. Netconcepts’ client base has traditionally been ecommerce clients. The ability to service some of each will be refreshing, and enable us to broaden our vocabulary & skill sets into new industries and architectures.
  3. SEO services team. With a team twice the size, with tools and methods developed by two strong SEO services teams, and with two technology solutions at the ready to compliment the services we offer, I’m really looking forward to leaping forward as a combined team.
  4. Proximity to the beach. Well, maybe not the beach part since I dislike sun, sand and water. But 70 degrees sounds pretty darn good as I shovel out my driveway again in the dark and cold.

Here’s to a new era for the new Madison Covario team, and cheers to our new mother ship in sunny San Diego, Covario!


Web PieRat logo.

Originally posted on Web PieRat.